There has been quite a lot going on over the last couple of weeks that I feel is important to post in 'LATEST ISSUES' but that means I am a little behind schedule with the main part of my blog being told in 'JUST CAWS'. I am also impatient to continue with my 'THEORY OF EVERYTHING', the attempt to come to terms with what happened to me during 'art therapy' with Sally Mungall between September and December, 2021.
I have just written to Matt Jonkers at the Health and Care Professions Council with regard to his advisement that a set of allegations against their registrant, Sally Mungall, has been drafted in anticipation of being referred to their Investigation Committee Panel next February. The set of allegations drafted is currently incomplete and my email, published below, details my protest at the decision to disregard a significant portion of my 'fitness to practice' complaint.
My next post to my blog will resume with 'JUST CAWS', taking up my experiences with the Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust and Hampshire Police.
In the meantime...
'Your reference *********
'16th November, 2025
Dear Matt Jonkers,
I received your email dated 6th November, 2025 with absolute incredulity. I was so dismayed by the details that I suffered a serious setback in my mental health recovery and have been profoundly ill over the last 10 days.
Your email also marks your introduction being the first time you have corresponded with me. There have been at least four other people involved in this case, those being Cleo Fearon, Claire Sharkey, Dovlet Seyidov and yourself.
I sincerely believe that this lack of continuity has contributed significantly to the degrading of my serious complaints about your registrant, Sally L Mungall and the evidence that I have provided.
Much of the evidence forwarded by me to the HCPC, especially during Cleo Fearon’s tenure, has never been acknowledged. I suspect this evidence has been overlooked and never even considered. There is no other plausible explanation for the HCPC refusal to address the majority of my complaints.
You have told me that the threshold test has been met in relation to the Registrant working beyond scope of role and inadequate maintenance of boundaries but I have already provided evidence proving that Sally Mungall violated ALL of the Health and Care Professions Council ‘Standards of conduct, performance and ethics’ listed below.
Indeed, there has been a new revelation within the last few weeks that is being investigated by the Head of Nursing at CMHT, The Bridge Centre that may very well reveal further breaches of your ‘Standards of conduct, performance and ethics’ by your registrant.
I believe that further breaches remain hidden from me and the HCPC due to important information being withheld by the Trust. Do you not have similar legislative High Court powers as held by the Parliamentary Health Service Ombudsman to compel access to ALL records held by registrants and Trusts?
In his email to me dated 31st October, 2025, Dovlet Seyidov answered my question
I have email records of all documents sent to the HCPC over the past year. Is there a way to cross-reference these with HCPC’s records to ensure all evidence has been considered? If you are able to provide a list of the documents along with the dates they were sent, we may be able to verify receipt. Please note, however, that this does not guarantee a formal review will be conducted, nor can we confirm any subsequent action.
Your email dated the 6th November, 2025 suggests that you have already drafted the allegations for the Investigation Committee Panel. Am I still able to provide a list of documents and dates they were sent to ensure you have ALL the evidence that I submitted?
I have irrefutable evidence that proves breaches of your ‘Standards of conduct, performance and ethics’ in relation to my daughter and myself in each of the following categories
‘Treat service users and carers with respect
1.1 You must treat service users and carers as individuals, respecting their privacy and dignity.
1.2 You must work in partnership with service users and carers, involving them, where appropriate, in decisions about the care, treatment or other services to be provided.
1.3 You must empower and enable service users, where appropriate, to play a part in maintaining their own health and wellbeing and support them so they can make informed decisions.
Make sure you have consent
1.4 You must make sure that you have valid consent, which is voluntary and informed, from service users who have capacity to make the decision or other appropriate authority before you provide care, treatment or other services.
Challenge discrimination
1.5 You must treat people fairly and be aware of the potential impact that your personal values, biases and beliefs may have on the care, treatment or other services that you provide to service users and carers, and in your interactions with colleagues.
1.6 You must take action to ensure that your personal values, biases and beliefs do not lead you to discriminate against service users, carers or colleagues. Your personal values, biases and beliefs must not detrimentally impact the care, treatment or other services that you provide.
1.7 You must raise concerns about colleagues if you think that they are treating people unfairly, that their personal values, biases and beliefs have led them to discriminate against service users, carers or colleagues, or if they have detrimentally impacted the care, treatment or other services that they provide. This should be done following the relevant procedures within your practice and should maintain the safety of all involved.
Maintain appropriate boundaries
1.8 You must consider the potential impact that the position of power and trust you hold as a health and care professional may have on individuals when in social or personal settings.
1.9 You must take action to set and maintain appropriate professional boundaries with service users, carers and colleagues.
1.10 You must use appropriate methods of communication to provide care and other services related to your practice.
1.11 You must ensure that existing personal relationships do not impact professional decisions.
1.12 You must not abuse your position as a health and care practitioner to pursue personal, sexual, emotional or financial relationships with service users, carers or colleagues.
2. Communicate appropriately and effectively
Communicate with service users and carers
2.2 You must listen to service users and carers and take account of their needs and wishes.
2.3 You must give service users and carers the information they want or need, in a way they can understand.
2.5 You must use all forms of communication responsibly when communicating with service users and carers.
Social media and networking websites
2.10 You must use media-sharing networks and social networking sites responsibly.
3. Work within the limits of your knowledge and skills
Keep within your scope of practice
3.1 You must only practise in the areas where you have the appropriate knowledge, skills and experience to meet the needs of a service user safely and effectively.
3.3 You must refer a service user to an appropriate practitioner if the care, treatment or other services they need are beyond your scope of practice. This person must hold the appropriate knowledge, skills and experience to meet the needs of the service user safely and effectively.
Using information
5.1 You must treat information about service users as confidential.
Disclosing information
5.2 You must only disclose confidential information if:
- you have permission;
Manage your health
6.3 You must take responsibility for assessing whether changes to your physical and/or mental health will detrimentally impact your ability to practise safely and effectively. If you are unsure about your ability to do so, ask an appropriate health and care professional to make an assessment on your behalf.
Openness with service users and carers
8.1 You must be open, honest and candid when something has gone wrong with the care, treatment or other services that you provide, by:
- where applicable, alerting your employer of what has gone wrong and following the relevant internal procedures;
- informing service users and where appropriate carers, or where you do not have direct access to these individuals the lead clinician, that something has gone wrong;
- providing service users and carers with a detailed explanation of the circumstances in which things have gone wrong and the likely impact; and
- taking action to correct the mistake if possible and detailing this action to the service user and where appropriate, their carer.
8.2 You must apologise to a service user and their carer when something has gone wrong with the care, treatment or other services that you provide.
Deal with concerns and complaints
8.3 You must support service users and carers who want to raise concerns about the care, treatment or other services they have received.
8.4 You must give a helpful and honest response to anyone who complains about the care, treatment or other services they have received.
Personal and professional behaviour
9.1 You must make sure that your conduct justifies the public’s trust and confidence in you and your profession.
9.4 You must declare issues that might create conflicts of interest and make sure that they do not influence your judgement.
10. Keep records of your work
Keep accurate records
10.1 You must keep full, clear and accurate records for everyone you care for, treat or provide other services to.
10.2 You must complete all records promptly and as soon as possible after providing care, treatment or other services.
10.3 You must keep records secure by protecting them from loss, damage or inappropriate access.’
My confidence in the HCPC ‘fitness to practice’ complaints process is very low.
I have provided evidence that your registrant, Sally L Mungall deliberately deceived her colleagues and leadership at CAMHS, Bramblys Drive, Basingstoke and the wider Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust about me and the nature of the ‘art therapy’ she delivered while I was under her therapeutic care.
I have provided evidence that she abused me during the ‘art therapy’. I have provided evidence that she had a strong, profoundly negative ‘counter-transference’ reaction to me the first time she met me, ‘ feeling violated by the presence in the room’. That ‘counter-transference’ which she brought into our therapeutic relationship comes from her own past. I have good reason to believe that she was experiencing a breakdown in her own private relationship when I first met her. I believe that these two issues contributed to her motivation to abuse me. Her heavy reliance on ‘supervision’ suggests that she was having trouble dealing with her own counter-transference. She even admitted in one of our therapy sessions that she felt she was abusing me. Is the HCPC actually investigating this aspect of my complaint?
I insist that she never obtained informed consent before delivering ‘art therapy’ and actually cajoled me into engaging with the work.
I have provided evidence that proves she lied about me and lied to me. Actually lied to my face.
I have provided evidence that she misrepresented me to colleagues in neighbouring health services including CRISIS and CMHT, The Bridge Centre.
I have provided evidence that she shared personal and confidential information to colleagues in CMHT, The Bridge Centre.
I have provided evidence that she neglected her clinical responsibilities while acting as Lead Clinician overseeing my daughter while a patient at CAMHS.
I maintain that she allowed a ‘culture of pessimism’ about Adult Services to influence her decision not to transmission my daughter from Child Services on time.
I have provided evidence to prove that she filled in questionnaires and assessments about my daughter without my daughter being personally involved or present in clear violation of NICE guidelines.
Sally L Mungall did NOT follow your own ‘Standards of conduct, performance and ethics’ , sections 8.1 to 8.4. I had already complained to the Trust through their PALS representative and been met with dishonesty and obstruction. The next stage of the complaint process was the Parliamentary Health Ombudsman Service but I was informed by them of an 11 month wait for a caseworker due to Covid 19. I followed YOUR advisements laid out in ‘Standards of conduct, performance and ethics’ , sections 8.1 to 8.4’ and sent a polite letter to her asking for help in understanding what had gone wrong in ’art therapy’. Sally L Mungall ignored your ‘Standards of conduct, performance and ethics’ and called Hampshire Police. I am now on Hampshire Police’s database under a ‘Category 2 Violent & Sexual Offences’ for allegedly ‘stalking/harassment’ following ‘unwanted contact’’. I put it to you that Sally L Mungall breached sections 8.1 to 8.4. I believe that she also lied to and or misled Hampshire Police both in September 2022 and previously in February 2022 although I cannot confirm or challenge the veracity of any claim or accusation made by her as I am denied access to those records, not have third party consent.
I believe Sally L Mungall to be profoundly dishonest and a risk to service users, especially children and adolescents.
If the HCPC continues to refuse to investigate the FULL scope of the complaints against her then I will escalate and complain about you. I will, in the meantime, continue with my own investigation and continue to campaign, protest and publicise this story through my blog, social media, tv, radio, newspaper, MP and Parliament. I will do this for as long as Hampshire Police hold false, discriminatory and psychologically damaging about me on their database, stated by them to be until 2032 or until I reach 100 years old.
I absolutely trusted Sally.
My daughter and I openly loved Sally.
Sally betrayed both of us.
Yours sincerely,
Mark Stock
