LATEST ISSUES 12th March, 2026

This is Part Two of the current draft of my latest 'Open Letter' now scheduled to be delivered on the 16th March. I will publish Part Three of the current draft of my latest 'Open Letter' on the 14th March.

'It should be understood by all concerned that the events highlighted by this document began innocently in the late autumn of 2018 when I first brought my severely mentally unwell daughter, Meg, to CAMHS, Bramblys Drive, Basingstoke desperate for help. For more than SEVEN YEARS since I have been faced with clinical neglect and abuse, dishonesty, lies, corruption, contempt, indifference, delay, incompetence, obstruction and obfuscation across two NHS Foundation Trusts, Hampshire Police and the Parliamentary Health Service Ombudsman. While advocating on behalf of my daughter I have been psychologically damaged and criminally accused and while defending myself against spurious accusations and false allegations I have stress-tested formal complaints processes only to find them ineffectual and ‘corrupt by design’. I have since been forced to protest by way of hunger strikes and demonstration only to be vilified as a suspect of terrorism!

I am and always have been just a beleaguered single dad and carer to a mentally ill daughter.

The addressees of this ‘Open Letter’ are

Hampshire Police

Alexis Boon QPM, Chief Constable Hampshire and Isle of Wight Constabulary,

Alex Reading, Chief Inspector Hart & Rushmoor district,

Hayley O'Grady, Chief Inspector Hayley O'Grady Basingstoke district,

Donna Jones, the Police and Crime Commissioner for Hampshire and the Isle of Wight,

James Howard 12913, mental health liaison,

Jason Russell C2093, Senior Manager for Public Access JIMU,

Roy Wilsher, HM Inspectorate of Constabulary.

Hampshire & IOW Healthcare Foundation Trust

Darren Humphrey, Director of Quality and Professions - Hampshire & IOW Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust,

Sadie Bell, Director of Information Governance - Hampshire & IOW Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust,

John Kelly, Services Manager, CMHT The Bridge Centre - Hampshire & IOW Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust,

Dr Chinu Simon, Consultant Psychiatrist,  CMHT Bridge Centre, Basingstoke - Hampshire & IOW Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust,

Dr Viv Cowdrill, Consultant Clinical Psychologist, mid-north Hants psychological services - Hampshire & IOW Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust,

Ron Shields, Chief Executive - Hampshire & IOW Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust.

PARLIAMENTARY HEALTH SERVICE OMBUDSMAN

Emily Sills, Head of Ombudsman Assurance Team

PREVENT WATCH

Dr Layla Aitjhdt and Anna Sekular, Directors and Senior Caseworkers.

The HEALTH AND CARE PROFESSIONS COUNCIL

INFORMATION COMMISSIONERS OFFICE

Paula Flanagan, Lead Case Officer.

NHS Hampshire and Isle of Wight Integrated Care Board

Maggie MacIsaac, Chief Executive of NHS

Health and Social Care Select Committee

Office of the Independent Prevent Commissioner

Reference number TK8EP2NS.

SHABANA MAHMOOD, Home Secretary

LUKE MURPHY, MP for Basingstoke

This ‘Open Letter’ is formed of three parts

1)      HAMPSHIRE POLICE

2)      HAMPSHIRE & IOW HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION TRUST and HAMPSHIRE POLICE

3)      THE PARLIAMENTARY HEALTH SERVICE OMBUDSMAN

1)     HAMPSHIRE POLICE

Before I go ahead with my New Campaign and exponentially increase the risk to my physical and mental health I am appealing to Hampshire Police to remove information it currently holds on their database under my name on the grounds that the information is FALSE.

Hampshire Police currently hold records on their database under my name in three ‘Occurrence details’ referenced ‘*********42’, ‘*********19’ and ‘*********62’.

‘Occurrence details *********42’ appears to be the original record.

‘Occurrence details *********19’ appears to be a mistake resulting from ‘some crossed wires’ but apparently remains on the Hampshire Police database with embellishments.

‘Occurrence details *********62’ appears to be another mistake being ‘a duplicate of *********19’ but apparently remains on the Hampshire Police database.

‘Occurrence details *********42’ reports ‘Occurrence Type’ as ‘Stalking/Harassment’, ‘Summary’ as ‘INFT reporting stalking/harassment from an’ and ‘Primary investigation WHAT HAS HAPPENED? This incident is in relation to a continuation of on-going harassment between MARK STOCK ( suspect ). Police have visited MARK STOCK on the 25^th September 2022 at 9am to speak to him about making unwanted contact to…’

‘Occurrence details *********19’ is particularly egregious as it reports the same as the previous ‘Occurrence details *********42’ but makes an embellishment under ‘Reports’, ie ‘Police have already dealt with the same stalking incident…’

I categorically deny ‘making unwanted contact’, ‘harassment’ and or ‘stalking’!

‘Unwanted contact’ I did NOT make ‘unwanted contact’ with anyone. How can anyone reasonably believe that any contact with anyone is ‘unwanted’ unless it is categorically stated, verbally or in writing, that contact is ‘unwanted’? Sally Mungall had NEVER made me aware that contact with her was ‘unwanted’. I sent Sally Mungall two forms of correspondence.

The first was a copy of the 50 page complaint report that I had also sent to the Patient Advisory Liaison Service at the Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust at the end of July 2022. I sent this 50 page document out of professional courtesy because I knew that the Trust was acting dishonestly while investigating my complaints. I believed that the Trust were being disingenuous and didn’t want Sally Mungall ‘blindsided’ by my complaints which were about to be escalated to the Parliamentary Health Service Ombudsman.

The second was a letter written following the advisements laid out by the Health and Care Professions Council in their ‘Ethics and Standards’. The letter asked for Sally Mungall’s accountability, to explain what had gone wrong while I was under her therapeutic care and an explanation for why she had so grossly misrepresented me to her clinical cohorts and leadership within the Trust and with colleagues at CRISIS and CMHT The Bridge Centre. The Parliamentary Health Service Ombudsman had informed me that a caseworker would not be allocated to my complaint for up to 11 months due to a Covid 19 backlog. My only other recourse of accountability was a ‘fitness to practice’ complaint about her with the Health and Care Professions Council. I was reluctant to file a ‘fitness to practice’ complaint against Sally Mungall because I didn’t want to jeopardise her professional reputation or risk her livelihood ( ‘fitness to practice’ investigations can lead to registrants being punitively sanctioned or even ‘struck off’ and barred from practice ). Honest answers to the questions posed in my letter might have persuaded me against a ‘fitness to practice‘ complaint. The last paragraph of my letter explained that if Sally Mungall felt uncomfortable with my contact that she should inform me and would not contact her again.

Sally Mungall had TWO opportunities to inform me that contact with her was ‘unwanted’. Sally Mungall ignored BOTH opportunities and called Hampshire Police instead.

‘Harassment’. I did NOT ‘harass’ anyone. By all reasonable accounts Harassment is recognised as behaviour intended to cause a person alarm or distress. – https://sentencingcouncil.org.uk/resources/common-offences/harassment-and-stalking/ I did NOT intend to harass anyone, nor cause alarm or distress. My contact was polite and reasonable. My contact was absolutely necessary under the circumstances and was made under advisement of Sally Mungall’s regulatory board, the Health and Care Professions Council by way of their ‘Standards of conduct, performance and ethics, Section 8

‘Openness with service users and carers

8.1 You must be open, honest and candid when something has gone wrong with the care, treatment or other services that you provide, by: 

- where applicable, alerting your employer of what has gone wrong and following the relevant internal procedures; - informing service users and where appropriate carers, or where you do not have direct access to these individuals the lead clinician, that something has gone wrong;- providing service users and carers with a detailed explanation of the circumstances in which things have gone wrong and the likely impact; and- taking action to correct the mistake if possible and detailing this action to the service user and where appropriate, their carer.’

- https://www.hcpc-uk.org/standards/standards-of-conduct-performance-and-ethics/

Sally Mungall was a responsible trained healthcare professional who knew with absolutely certainty that I would never intend to cause her alarm or distress. Indeed, medical records quote Sally Mungall’s insistence that she felt no fear for her safety from me. I believe Sally Mungall opted to use the state power of the police to absolve herself of her professional responsibility and to avoid accountability. Reporting me to the police was dishonest and cowardly.

‘Stalking’. I did NOT ‘stalk’ anyone. There is absolutely NO evidence of ‘stalking’ because it never happened. I have challenged and continue to challenge Hampshire Police to present evidence of ‘stalking’. Evidence suggests that accusations of ‘stalking’ were first engineered by my accuser, Sally Mungall, in conversations with clinicians at CMHT The Bridge Centre, Basingstoke in February 2022. The accusations are likely based on the fact that I knew the home address of Sally Mungall. I actually knew the address of Sally Mungall because she advertised her art therapy services online. Sally Mungall managed a website that detailed her services and even included photographs of her, the terrace of houses where her home where her art therapy practice is based and invitations and directions to her art therapy room in the back garden of her home. There was and still are multiple online references to Sally Mungall’s art therapy practice including her address by postcode and precise location maps. Am I really guilty of ‘stalking’ Sally Mungall because I have access to the internet and can read Sally Mungall’s online solicitations?

Did Sally Mungall actually accuse me of ‘stalking’? If she did then that would amount to a false allegation. This allegation should be investigated by Hampshire Police.

I NEVER ‘stalked’ Sally Mungall. I never went anywhere near her house and I never went anywhere near where she worked at CAMHS Bramblys Drive, Basingstoke after my daughter was discharged from CAMHS services.

The allegation of ‘stalking’ is absolutely FALSE!

Evidence revealed in my medical records and later in my daughter’s medical records detail multiple occurrences of misrepresentation of me by Sally Mungall. Sally Mungall actually lied to me. Sally Mungall’s clinical cohorts also misrepresented me and CAMHS General Manager, Wanda Reynolds, misrepresented me an lied about me and to me. Indeed, I uncovered a covert plan to misrepresent me, lie about me, monitor me, grossly mis-pathologise me and support criminalisation of me. Sally Mungall, Wanda Reynolds and other clinicians crafted a false narrative about me which was shared with colleagues working in CRISIS and CMHT, The Bridge Centre, Basingstoke. I firmly believe this false narrative was engineered to safeguard the professional reputation of Sally Mungall and the institutional reputations of CAMHS, Bramblys Drive, Basingstoke and the wider Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust.

There needs to be a full investigation into all matters relating to Sally Mungall, Wanda Reynolds, CAMHS and the wider Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust.

I have been suffering a pervasive and permanent mental health crisis as a direct result of actions taken by Sally Mungall, Wanda Reynolds, CAMHS and the wider Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust.

Hampshire Police are also involved in issues related to HAMPSHIRE & IOW HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION TRUST as outlined in Part Two below.'