I have copied and pasted the following 'right of review' application to the Office of the Police and Crime Commissioner for Hampshire and the Isle of Wight. This will be the third attempt to have false information held under my name removed from Hampshire Constabulary's database.
https://www.hampshire-pcc.gov.uk/contact-us/complaints-and-reviews/review-form
Office of the Police and Crime Commissioner for Hampshire
Your reference *********** 13th April 2025
Dear Sir/Madam,
I am writing to request a 'review' of the decision made by Luke Finnegan at Professional Standards of Hampshire Constabulary dated 2 April, 2025.
Section 3: Information about your complaint
Date you made your complaint to Hampshire Constabulary (30/03/2025)
Hampshire Constabulary Complaint Reference Number ***********
Date of your outcome letter (02/04/2025)
Section 4: Information about your review
Explain why you want your complaint reviewed
1) The original decision to send a police officer to my home address on the 25/09/2025 was wrong. IT IS MY CONTENTION that Hampshire Constabulary should have made a more robust enquiry of my accuser, Sally Mungall, before visiting me at my home on the 25th September, 2022. Police officers should have read my document and supporting ‘contact’ letter and determined that I was not ‘harassing’ Sally Mungall. The reasonable advice should have been offered to Sally Mungall that she inform me directly or by proxy that my ‘contact’ with her was unwanted. I had no reasonable expectation to believe my contact was unwanted.
I was following the advisement of Sally Mungall’s regulatory body, the Health and Care Professions Council, particularly their codified set ‘Standards of conduct, performance and ethics’, the ‘ethical framework within which our registrants must work’ and
Section 8. of the ‘Standards of conduct, performance and ethics’ states, ‘Be open when things go wrong’
Openness with service users and carers -where applicable, alerting your employer of what has gone wrong and following the relevant internal procedures; - informing service users and where appropriate carers, or where you do not have direct access to these individuals the lead clinician, that something has gone wrong;- providing service users and carers with a detailed explanation of the circumstances in which things have gone wrong and the likely impact; and- taking action to correct the mistake if possible and detailing this action to the service user and where appropriate, their carer.
8.2 You must apologise to a service user and their carer when something has gone wrong with the care, treatment or other services that you provide.’
Following the advisement from the HCPC and in accordance with Section 8 of their ‘Standards of conduct, performance and ethics’, I first sent a copy of a document of my complaints and then a polite letter to Sally Mungall asking for help in understanding a) what had gone wrong during therapy with her and b) why I had been so grossly misrepresented by her and her clinical cohorts and leadership within CAMHS.
The final paragraph of the letter stated, implicitly, that if she felt uncomfortable with my communication then to let me know and I would desist. She chose to contact Hampshire Constabulary.
In my opinion, Sally Mungall cynically and vexatiously used the state power of the police to deflect my reasonable and polite request and to avoid her professional responsibility.
Hampshire Constabulary would have known that the decision to send a police officer to my home on the 25th September, 2022 would lead, inexorably, to ‘occurrences’ being recorded on their database. There are actually THREE ‘occurrences’ in my name currently held by Hampshire Constabulary on their database, two of which are, by their own admission, mistakes. Regardless, Hampshire Constabulary refuse to remove any of those ‘occurrences’.
2) Information about me currently held by Hampshire Constabulary on their database is false. There are currently three ‘occurrences’ that accuse me of making ‘unwanted contact’, for ‘stalking and harassing’, for ‘violent and or sexual offences’ and being a permanent ‘risk’ to the public!!
There is absolutely no way that my ‘contact’ with Sally Mungall could reasonably be construed as ‘harassment’. Indeed, Police Staff Amy Lowe 17010 replied to one of my enquiries dated 12th October, 2022 stating that PC Newstead’s visit to my home on the 25th September, 2022 ‘was not a harassment warning’ and yet ‘occurrences’ were entered onto the Hampshire Constabulary database under a heading of ‘stalking/harassment’. ‘Occurrences actually state ‘ongoing harassment’. There was NO harassment.
For clarification, THESE ARE MY ASSERTIONS
a) I did NOT commit an OFFENCE
b) I am NOT guilty of STALKING
c) I am NOT guilty of HARASSMENT
d) I am NOT guilty of a VIOLENT OFFENCE or CRIME
e) I am NOT guilty of a SEXUAL OFFENCE or CRIME
f) I am NOT a risk to the public
g) I did NOT commit a crime
h) I NEVER WAS, NOR HAVE EVER BEEN A RISK TO ANYONE OTHER THAN MYSELF.
i) I have NEVER hurt anyone.
j) I have NEVER threatened anyone.
k) I have NEVER intimidated or coerced anyone.
l) I have NEVER insinuated harm or threat of harm nor made any veiled threat of harm.
I would expect the various psychotherapists, psychiatrists, care coordinators and nurses that have treated me at CMHT The Bridge Centre, Basingstoke, Hampshire to all vouch for my good character. I have met the associate director of Southern Health and met the Head of Nursing at CMHT The Bridge Centre under Southern Health multiple times. I am now very well acquainted with the Head of Nursing for Mid & North Hants, Southern Health who has been personally involved with my mental health. I can forward multiple professional character references who can vouch for me and confirm that I have never been a ‘risk’ to anyone but myself.
The records currently being retained by Hampshire Constabulary have significant adverse and negative consequences for me. I could explain those consequences in fine detail but, for the sake of brevity I will outline the following
a) I am now unable to safely form new relationships, especially with women lest another spurious claim is made against me and Hampshire Constabulary determine a pattern of behaviour and prosecute me. Any potential future relational grievance can now be weaponsied against me. I have socially isolated myself since September 2025 and will need to socially isolate myself for the rest of my life.
b) I had previously enjoyed a very successful career that included teaching and lecturing. Some positions of employment that I have previously held required an enhanced DBS check. I am now and forever denied many future employment opportunities because I will likely fail future DBS checks. I have written to the government department that handles DBS checks and they have confirmed the strong possibility that I will fail such checks. ( The types of DBS check are: an enhanced check, which shows the same as a standard check plus ANY INFORMATION HELD BY LOCAL POLICE that’s considered relevant to the role - https://www.gov.uk/criminal-record-checks-apply-role ).
c) I am now traumatised by the involvement of Hampshire Constabulary. I find the bearing of these odious accusations completely untenable. I have been the beneficiary of four different psychotherapists working with me to try and mend the psychological damage done by Sally Mungall and her clinical and leadership cohorts and also the trauma inflicted by Hampshire Constabulary. The labelling of me as a violent, sexual offender accused of stalking and harassing are intolerable. I am almost certain never to fully recover from this ordeal.
d) My faith and confidence in the police and the justice system is irrevocably damaged.
3) I cannot afford justice. It has been explained to me that my only legal basis to challenge an OPCC review is through a Judicial Review. A Judicial Review is prohibitively expensive and I do not have the financial resources to fund a Judicial Review.
IT SHOULD BE NOTED THAT I AM CURRENTLY ENGAGED IN PROTESTS AGAINST HAMPSHIRE CONSTABULARY’S DECISION TO RETAIN FALSE, DISCRIMINATORY AND PSYCHOLOGICALLY DAMAGING INFORMATION UNDER MY NAME ON THEIR DATABASE.
I am currently committed to protest by way of hunger strike and I will take this protest to its ultimate and irreversible conclusion. I am currently confined to a virtual prison and been rendered a social pariah. I am denied freedom. I am denied life.
My hunger strike will eventually endanger my life and I will likely be detained under Section 2 of the Mental Health Act. If I am detained then I will comply until I am released, after which I will begin another hunger strike. I will escalate my protest at the beginning of June 2025 by demonstrating in and around sensitive locations in London. My protest will likely provoke an over-reaction by police who may use lethal force. I will, at some point, refuse to be detained and abscond instead. I will die in the countryside.
I have appealed and will continue to appeal to the mainstream media and actively continue to seek legal representation. I WILL DO WHATEVER IT TAKES TO BRING MY CASE TO WIDESPREAD PUBLIC ATTENTION.
I am currently journalling my story on social media. You are invited to read my blog at
One of the motivations for sharing my story on social media was to ensure that I had the widest available audience watching me when I started my hunger strike. There was absolutely NO movement by Hampshire Constabulary following my previous hunger strike which lasted almost nine weeks. It will be interesting to see the reaction when my story is laid bare under public scrutiny and judged in the court of public opinion.
Please outline if you are unhappy with the way your original complaint to Hampshire Constabulary was handled or the final outcome of your case. Please provide details explaining why.
The injustice metered out by Hampshire Constabulary has, to all intent and purpose, permanently incarcerated me. Hampshire Constabulary have dealt with my original complaint by absolving themselves of responsibility, claiming that I can only be released following a Judicial Review. I have been led to believe that the ‘call out’ charge for a locksmith of this type of constitutional law is somewhere in the order of £30,000. This extortionate cost is well beyond my financial means. I cannot afford justice.
The handling of my original complaint proves that Hampshire Constabulary is willing to interpret statutory guidance in favour of those who make spurious accusations while disfavouring those that are wrongly accused. The handling of my original complaint proves that Hampshire Constabulary Professional Standards is willing to uphold subjective professional judgements by Hampshire Constabulary even when they are wrong. The handling of my original complaint proves that Hampshire Constabulary Professional Standards is willing to uphold decisions by Hampshire Constabulary that defame, discredit and disadvantage those accused. Hampshire Constabulary Professional Standards is ignoring the fact that I am not guilty of the accusations made against me and ignoring the fact that false allegations are being retained by Hampshire Constabulary as though those accusations were true. Hampshire Constabulary Professional Standards is upholding the decision to allow Hampshire Constabulary to retain false information about me on their database. ‘No Further Action’ is NOT an exoneration. The false information about me held on Hampshire Constabulary’s database IS a virtual criminal record and CAN be used against me.
‘We only independently investigate the most serious and sensitive matters. These are the type of matters that have the potential to affect public confidence in the police, such as deaths and serious injuries.’ - https://www.policeconduct.gov.uk/complaints/guide-to-complaints-process
I would suggest that my case is a most serious and sensitive matter and that the injustice metered out by Hampshire Constabulary is currently putting my life at risk. There is absolute certainty their refusal to remove the false information about me from their database will ultimately result in my death.
Please explain what you would like to happen
I want Hampshire Constabulary to remove ALL records from their database that name me.
Please explain what you would like to have happen as a result of your review. This helps us to focus our efforts on addressing what matters most to you.
I want Hampshire Constabulary to apologise to me for the psychological distress they have caused for more than two and a half years.
I want Hampshire Constabulary to forward explanation to any change or improvement in policy resulting from my complaint.
