LATEST ISSUES 11th April, 2026

I have just forwarded the following email to Layla and Anna at Prevent Watch. This email uses some of the material published here on the 9th April, 2026. Let nobody ever forget that this clusterfuck has a tap root that reaches all the way back, five years ago, to art therapist, Sally Mungall and her clinical cohorts at CAMHS, Bramblys Drive, Basingstoke and the wider Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust.

11th April, 2026

Dear Layla and Anna,

I met with Darren Humphrey, Director of Quality and Professions - Hampshire and Isle of Wight Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, on Wednesday 8th April, to be appraised of his investigations into my ongoing complaints, particularly with reference to the contentious referral of me to Prevent by Gemma Stubbington on behalf of the Trust.

DARREN HUMPHREY ADMITTED THAT THE REFERRAL OF ME TO PREVENT WAS NOT IN RESPONSE TO ANY PERCEIVED INTENT ON MY PART TO PLAN OR TO COMMIT A TERRORIST ACT.

DARREN HUMPHREY TOLD ME THAT THE REFERRAL WAS BASED ON THE PREMISE THAT I WAS SUSCEPTIBLE TO RADICALISATION YET NO EVIDENCE OF RADICALISATION EXISTS.

NO IDEOLOGY HAS EVER BEEN IDENTIFIED BECAUSE NONE EXISTS.

DARREN HUMPHREY TOLD ME THE SIMPLE FACT THAT I WAS CONSIDERED VULNERABLE MADE AN ABSOLUTE NECCESSITY TO INITIATE SAFEGUARDING.

I ARGUED THAT A PREVENT REFERRAL WAS NOT APPROPRIATE SAFEGUARDING.

DARREN HUMPHREY EXPLAINED THE RATIONALE FOR THE REFERRAL TO PREVENT WAS THAT I MIGHT HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED BY A TERRORIST GROUP OR PERSUADED BY SOME IDEOLOGICAL ENTITY. THE EMPHASIS IS ON ‘MIGHT HAVE’. THESE ARE NOT GROUNDS FOR A REFERRAL TO PREVENT. THE PREVENT TRAINING, WHICH I HAVE TWICE COMPLETED, IS ABSLOUTELY CLEAR ON THE GROUNDS.

DARREN HUMPHREY STILL COULD NOT ACCOUNT FOR GEMMA STUBBINGTON’S CONTENTIOUS BOX-TICKING ON THE NATIONAL PREVENT REFERRAL FORM THOUGH HE DID SUGGEST THAT SHE TICKED THE ‘CONCERNING USE OF THE INTERNET’ REFERRING TO MY BLOG, www.fourandtwentydeadcrows.com. MY BLOG IS A JOURNAL ABOUT MY HARROWING JOURNEY THROUGH MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES IN BASINGSTOKE WHILE ADVOCATING AS A SINGLE DAD ON BEHALF OF A MENTALLY UNWELL DAUGHTER. GEMMA STUBBINGTON HAD LATER CONFESSED TO ME THAT SHE HAD NEVER ACTUALLY READ MY BLOG.

I received the rest of his appraisal with absolute incredulity. He relayed the rationale for referral, as expressed by Gemma Stubbington and the Safeguarding Board of the Trust who are alleged to have offered advice on the referral. Darren confirmed, again, that Hampshire Police insisted the referral go ahead though no evidence of this insistence will be voluntarily presented to me. CONTEXT is missing from Darren’s ‘truth claim’.

The rationale for the referral was evidently flawed.

The rationale for the referral wholly demonstrates an appalling lack of professional competence, a complete failure to understand the basic premise and working practice as outlined in the Prevent Duty guidance: for England and Wales (2015) and abuse of power.

Darren told me that I was never meant to have been given access to the National Prevent Referral Form that Gemma Stubbington completed. I wasn’t supposed to be able to scrutinise that form and shine a critical spotlight onto that travesty. Darren did acknowledge that Gemma Stubbington’s completed referral lacked the analytical detail required but was still unable to explain Gemma Stubbington’s fraudulent entries onto the National Prevent Referral Form.

Darren confirmed that I would not be given any further access to my personal data held by the Trust relating to the Prevent referral.

Apparently exemptions apply to my Access to Records requests made to Sadie Bell’s team within Information Governance at the Trust.

The first exemption was applied in 2025 and confirmed by Sadie Bell by email on the 15th December that year, ‘if we hold any information relating to you and a PREVENT referral, this would be exempt under Section 45(4)(b) of the Data Protection Act 2018, at the request of the police service and as part of the PREVENT process.’

And yet, Jason Russell , of JIMU, Hampshire Police, wrote to me by email on 2nd January 2025, 'As outlined previously, I will not comment on another organisations response to your Right of Access request.  You will need to direct any issues to them.' Jason Russell and Sadie Bell were playing tennis with my personal data with me at the net. They still are.

When Paula Flanagan, Lead Case Officer at the Information Commissioners Office challenged Sadie Bell on this exemption she doubled down and added another exemption, almost SIX MONTHS after my initial Access to Records request.

The second exemption was applied on the 6th February, 2026 ie Schedule 2, Part 3, Paragraph 18 DPA 2018 which ‘permits restriction where disclosure would be likely to cause serious harm to the physical or mental health of any individual.' THAT INDIVIDUAL WOULD BE ME!

This is an obviously cynical and dishonest attempt to deny me access to my personal data. A competent and honest Director of Information Governance would have applied that second exemption from the outset and NOT after a former exemption was being challenged by the Information Commissioners Office.

And what exactly of this second exemption, anyway?

Is disclosure really going to cause serious harm to MY physical or mental health? FUCK OFF!

DENYING ME ACCESS TO MY PERSONAL DATA IS ABSOLUTELY CAUSING ME MENTAL HARM. CONTINUED DENIAL OF ACCESS TO MY PERSONAL DATA WILL EVENTUALLY CAUSE ME PHYSICAL HARM. FACT!

And what of Hampshire Police and their use of Section 45(4)(b) of the Data Protection Act 2018  Part 3 ?

What are Hampshire Police hiding behind this exemption?

Darren Humphrey suggested that the actioning, assessment and immediate closure of the referral by Dawn Jenks 25487, Prevent Officer - Hampshire | Counter Terrorism Policing South East in July 2025 meant that I was no longer a criminal suspect. Pfftt.. An explanation of Section 45(4)(b) of the Data Protection Act 2018 Part 3 is outlined by the Information Commissioners Office

‘You must only use Part 3 for responding to SARs, if you are:

• a competent authority; and

• using the information for one of the law enforcement purposes.

The law enforcement purposes are defined under section 31 as,

“…the purposes of the prevention, investigation, detection or prosecution of criminal offences or the execution of criminal penalties, including the safeguarding against and the prevention of threats to public security”.

Paula Flanagan continues to challenge Sadie Bell and the Trust.

These are the facts.

I HAVE COMMITTED NO CRIMINAL OFFENCES!

THE REFERRAL WAS ACTIONED, ASSESSED AND CLOSED WITHIN THREE DAYS LAST JULY SO THERE ARE NO CRIMINAL PENALTIES PENDING AND NO THREATS TO PUBLIC SECURITY!

I HAVE ASKED FOR MY PERSONAL DATA FROM SADIE BELL AT THE TRUST. DENIED!

I HAVE ASKED SADIE BELL TO ACCOUNT FOR THE ‘SERIOUS HARMS’ TEST THAT WOULD HAVE BEEN MADE TO SUPPORT THE USE OF THE SECOND EXEMPTION. DENIED!

I HAVE ASKED FOR MY PERSONAL DATA FROM JASON RUSSELL C2093 AT JIMU HAMPSHIRE POLICE. DENIED!

I HAVE ASKED GEMMA STUBBINGTON ON MULTIPLE OCCASSIONS TO ACCOUNT FOR THE FALSE INFORMATION SHE ENTERED ONTO THE PREVENT REFERRAL FORM. IGNORED!

I HAVE ASKED POLICE MENTAL HEALTH LIAISON, JAMES HOWARD 12923, FOR MORE THAN TWO MONTHS, TO ANSWER POLITE AND REASONABLE QUESTIONS ABOUT HIS INVOLVEMENT IN THE REFERRAL. IGNORED!

I HAVE ASKED CHIEF CONSTABLE OF HAMPSHIRE POLICE, ALEXIS BOON, TO INVESTIGATE MY SERIOUS COMPLAINTS. DEFLECTED!

I HAVE ASKED TANYA SMITH, OFFICE MANAGER, CHIEF OFFICER GROUP, TO REDIRECT MY SERIOUS COMPLAINTS TO ALEXIS BOON. IGNORED!

Darren Humphrey will be forwarding a written summary of Wednesday’s meeting shortly. I will confirm all of his findings and publish to my blog at www.fourandtwentydeadcrows.com thereafter.

In the meantime, the clock has been ticking since the 25th March, 2026. If the issues that are currently plaguing my life are not resolved then there WILL be an event.

‘The new campaign started on the 25th March, 2026, exactly six calendar months until the anniversary of the visit by PC Newstead to my home on the 25th September, 2022.

I am appealing to everyone identified in the list of addressees above to take note and, where appropriate, take action.

I will not allow my appeal to go unheard beyond 25th September, 2026.

I will have already endured four years of injustice, under the shadow of obscene criminal accusations, socially isolated and virtually incarcerated.

I will take back my life or die in the process.

I AM NOT A CRIMINAL’ - from my ‘Open Letter’ dated 17th March, 2026

I am still determined to take legal action against the Trust and Hampshire Police if advised. 

The contentious referral of me to Prevent was made on the 18^th June, 2025. I understand that there is a statute of limitations and mindful that there are now only two months left until the expiry of one year. Do you need any more information beyond the documents that I forwarded on the 30^th January, 2026? I can make myself available to lawyers affiliated with Prevent Watch by telephone or in person at short notice.

With kind regards,

Mark Stock